If you or a loved one had a C.R. Bard vaginal mesh implant or Bard bladder sling and suffered from pelvic mesh complications or injuries, you may be entitled to recover compensation from a Bard mesh lawsuit or settlement.
A team of medical device injury lawyers and attorneys is investigating claims of women and their spouses who have suffered trans vaginal mesh complications and pelvic mesh injuries from Bard mesh products that were surgically implanted to treat medical conditions such as pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
Bard Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Cases
Bard mesh lawsuit and settlement cases potentially being investigated include pelvic mesh injury claims of women who had a Bard pelvic mesh product or bladder sling device implanted that contained polypropylene mesh, including the following C.R. Bard mesh brands:
- Bard Align mesh lawsuits
- Bard Avaulta mesh lawsuit
- Bard InnerLace sling lawsuit
- Bard Pelvicol mesh lawsuit
- Bard PelviLace mesh lawsuits
- Bard PelviSoft BioMesh lawsuits
- Bard Pelvitex Polypropylene Mesh lawsuits
- Bard Uretex mesh sling lawsuit
- Bard Alyte Y-Mesh Graft
Bard Mesh Injury Cases
Bard mesh lawsuit and settlement cases potentially being investigated include claims of women who had a Bard mesh product implanted and suffered serious mesh problems, injuries, side-effects or complications including, corrective or revision surgery to adjust or remove the Bard mesh, surgery to repair damaged pelvic organs, tissue, or nerves or surgery to treat recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), among others.
Bard mesh lawsuits filed in federal district courts have been consolidated and/or transferred into a multi-district litigation or MDL in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, styled C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL Case no. 2187.
Defendants in the Bard MDL have included C.R. Bard Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited (“TSL”).
If you or someone you love had Bard vaginal mesh, bladder sling, transvaginal tape or pelvic mesh implanted and suffered injuries or mesh complications, you may be entitled to compensation from a Bard mesh lawsuit or settlement. Contact a medical device injury lawyer to request a free review.
*If you or a loved one are experiencing health issues, side effects or complications from a medical device (i.e., Align Urethral Support System, Align TO Urethral Support System, Avaulta Anterior BioSynthetic Support System, Avaulta Posterior BioSynthetic Support System, Avaulta Plus Anterior Support System, Avaulta Plus Posterior Biosynthetic Support System, Avaulta Solo Anterior Synthetic Support System, Avaulta Solo Posterior Synthetic Support System, InnerLace BioUrethral Support System Pelvicol Acellular Collagen Matrix, PelviLace BioUrethral Support System, PelviLace TO Trans-obturator BioUrethral Support System, PelviSoft Acellular Collagen BioMesh, Pelvitex Polypropylene Mesh, Uretex SUP Purbourethral Sling, Uretex TO Trans-obturator Urethral Support System, Uretex TO2 Trans-obturator Urethral Support System, Bard Alyte Y-Mesh Graft and/or Uretex TO3 Trans-obturator Urethral Support System), we urge you to promptly consult with your doctor or physician for an evaluation.
**The listing of a company or product (e.g., C.R. Bard, Sofradim or Tissue Science Laboratories vaginal mesh products) is not meant to state or imply that the company acted illegally or improperly or that the product is unsafe or defective; rather only that an investigation may be, is or was being conducted to determine whether legal rights have been violated.
***The use of any trademarks, tradenames or service marks is solely for product identification and/or informational purposes.
Fill out the form for a free attorney review.