If you or a loved one suffered mesh complications or injuries from Boston Scientific’s Solyx Single-Incision Sling SIS System, you may be entitled to recover compensation from a Boston Scientific Solyx mesh lawsuit or settlement.
A team of medical device injury lawyers and attorneys is investigating injury lawsuit cases of women who claim to have suffered complications, side effects or injuries from transvaginal mesh products that may have been used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence, including Boston Scientific’s Solyx Single-Incision Sling SIS System.
Boston Scientific Solyx Mesh Lawsuit Cases
Solyx sling lawsuit and settlement cases potentially being investigated include claims of women who had a Boston Scientific Solyx Single-Incision Sling SIS System surgically implanted and claim to have suffered serious mesh problems, injuries, side-effects or complications including, bladder sling revision surgery to remove or replace the Solyx Single-Incision Sling, to repair damage to pelvic organs, tissue, or nerves near the site of the Solyx Single-Incision Sling SIS and/or additional surgeries or re-operations to treat the recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and/or pelvic organ prolapse (POP), among other things.
Solyx Single-Incision Sling SIS System
The Boston Scientific Solyx sling vaginal mesh product is a single incision mid-urethral sling system featuring polypropylene mesh that is used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
If you or someone you love suffered injuries from a Solyx Single-Incision Sling, you may be entitled to compensation from a Boston Scientific Solyx mesh lawsuit or settlement. Contact a medical device injury lawyer to request a free case review.
*If you or a loved one are experiencing health issues, side effects or complications from a medical device, we urge you to promptly consult with your doctor or physician for an evaluation.
**The listing of a company (i.e,. Boston Scientific) or product (e.g., Solyx Single-Incision Sling SIS System) is not meant to state or imply that the company acted illegally or improperly or that the product is unsafe or defective; rather only that an investigation may be, is or was being conducted to determine whether legal rights have been violated.
***The use of any trademarks, tradenames or service marks is solely for product identification and/or informational purposes.
Fill out the form on the right for a free attorney review.