≡ Injury Lawsuit Connect ≡ Paragard IUD Lawsuit Cases

Paragard IUD Lawsuit [2025]: Did You (or a Loved One) Suffer Complications or Injury From A Paragard Intrauterine Device (IUD) That Fractured or Broke Into Pieces While Being Removed?

Paragard IUD lawsuit

If you or a loved one suffered complications or injuries from a Paragard IUD implant that broke and/or fractured while the IUD was being removed, you may be entitled to recover compensation from a Paragard IUD lawsuit case or settlement claim.

A team of medical device injury lawyers and class action attorneys is investigating potential lawsuit cases and settlement claims of women who suffered complications and injuries from a Paragard IUD implant that broke into pieces and/or fractured during the IUD removal process.

Paragard is a T-shaped copper-containing IUD or intra-uterine device (i.e., a long-term contraceptive or birth control device indicated for prevention of pregnancy in females of reproductive potential) comprised of a plastic frame made of polyethylene and barium sulfate that is inserted into the uterus by a healthcare provider. Paragard is a temporary, non-hormonal, non-surgical IUD that can remain in a woman’s body for up to 10 years.

Unfortunately, many women have reported health problems after having the Paragard IUD device implanted. As of March 31, 2024, more than 52,700 Paragard cases had been reported to the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System. Adverse events reported included, among others, complication of device removal, device breakage, device expulsion, device dislocation, and injury associated with the device.


Paragard IUD Injury Lawsuit: Overview


Paragard IUD Lawsuit Cases & Settlement Claims

Paragard IUD lawsuit and settlement cases potentially being investigated include claims of women who, after having a Paragard IUD implant removed, suffered serious injuries or complications including:

  • Breaking of IUD while being removed
  • Fracturing of IUD during removal
  • Surgery to remove broken IUD pieces
  • Broken IUD arm
  • Splintering of IUD
  • Hysterectomy
  • Chronic abdominal pain
  • Vaginal bleeding
  • Internal bleeding
  • Infection
  • Infertility
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
  • IUD migration
  • Allergic reaction to IUD pieces left in the body
  • Perforation of the uterus or cervix
  • Organ damage
  • IUD pieces lodged in organs
  • Broken IUD pieces cannot be removed
  • Death
  • Other IUD injuries or complications

If you or someone you love suffered injury or complications in connection with the removal of a Paragard IUD, you may be eligible to recover monetary compensation from a Paragard IUD lawsuit or settlement case.

Paragard Intra Uterine Device IUD Lawsuit Cases and Settlement Claims - Breakage or Fracturing During IUD Removal

Paragard Injury Lawsuit Complaints

Thousands of women who had Paragard IUDs implanted and later removed have filed lawsuits seeking to recover money damages for injuries suffered during the Paragard IUD removal process.

The Paragard lawsuit complaints allege, among other things, that the Paragard intrauterine device has a propensity to break upon removal, causing complications and injuries, including surgeries to remove the broken piece of the device, infertility, and pain.

Plaintiffs in the Paragard lawsuits allege that Defendants knew that there was a significant increased risk of adverse events associated with the Paragard IUD, including arm breakage. Plaintiffs in the Paragard IUD lawsuits further allege that neither they nor their doctors were provided adequate warning from Defendants of the risk of Paragard IUD failure and injury and/or the risk of removal of the Paragard IUD.

The Paragard lawsuit cases assert claims for, among other things, Strict Liability (Design Defect), Strict Liability (Failure to Warn), Strict Liability (Manufacturing Defect), Negligence, Negligence (Design and Manufacturing Defect), Negligence (Failure to Warn), Negligent Misrepresentation, Breach of Express Warranty, Breach of Implied Warranty, Violation of Consumer Protection Laws, Gross Negligence, Unjust Enrichment, Punitive Damages and/or Loss of Consortium.

Paragard IUD lawsuits filed in federal district courts have been consolidated and/or transferred into an MDL or multidistrict litigation, styled In RE: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation, Case No. 1:20-MD-2974-LMM, MDL 2974, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division (Judge Leigh Martin May).

Companies Sued For Paragard Injuries

Defendants named in the Paragard lawsuit cases have included various designers, developers, testers, manufacturers, marketers, packagers, sellers and/or distributors of Paragard IUD medical devices including:

  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
  • Teva Women’s Health, LLC
  • Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
  • The Cooper Companies, Inc. and
  • CooperSurgical, Inc.

Paragard IUD Products Involved In The Litigation

Paragard IUD models involved in the Paragard litigation include:

  • Paragard T 380
  • Paragard T 380A
  • Paragard Tcu380A

Paragard Lawsuit & Settlement Updates

Recent updates about Paragard lawsuits and settlements include:

  • February 2025: The Judge in the MDL issued a case management order that set various deadlines for discovery and scheduled bellwether trial dates for January 12, 2006, March 3, 2026 and May 11, 2026.

  • January 2025: As of January 2, 2025, there were 2,882 Paragard lawsuit cases pending in the federal Paragard multi-district litigation.
  • November 2024: The first Paragard bellwether trial is scheduled for December 1, 2025, and the second Paragard trial is tentatively scheduled for February 2, 2026.
  • May 2024: As of May 1, 2024, more than 2,650 Paragard cases had been filed or were pending in the Paragard MDL.
  • September 2023: The Judge issued a scheduling order setting a fact discovery deadline of February 9, 2024, expert discovery deadline of May 10, 2024 and a bellwether trial date of October 28, 2024.
  • January 2023: The Judge overseeing the Paragard MDL lawsuit appointed a mediator (retired Judge M. Gino Brogdon Sr.) to facilitate settlement talks between the parties.

Compensation For Paragard IUD Injuries

Plaintiffs who bring Paragard IUD lawsuits may be able to recover compensation for injuries suffered, including money damages for losses incurred as a result of IUD removal injuries, such as:

  • Compensatory damages for pain and suffering
  • Loss of wages or earnings due to missed work
  • Loss of future earning capacity
  • Medical care expenses incurred or to be incurred
  • Other out of pocket expenses
  • Loss of quality or enjoyment of life
  • Mental anguish/emotional distress
  • Loss of consortium
  • Other possible Paragard monetary damages
Compensation Possible For Paragard IUD Injury Lawsuit Claims - Money Damages May Be Available

Time Is Limited To File A Paragard IUD Lawsuit

Deadlines called statutes of limitation and statutes of repose may limit the amount of time that individuals have to file a Paragard lawsuit to try to recover compensation for injuries they claimed to have suffered from a Paragard IUD implant breaking or fracturing.

This means that if a Paragard IUD lawsuit case is not filed before the applicable time limit or deadline, the claimant may be prohibited from ever pursuing litigation or taking legal action regarding the Paragard injury claim. That is why it is important to connect with a Paragard IUD injury lawyer or attorney as soon as possible.

If you or a loved one suffered injury or complications from a Paragard IUD implant, you may be entitled to compensation from a Paragard IUD lawsuit case or settlement claim. Contact a medical device injury lawyer to request a free case review.

*If you or a loved one are experiencing health issues, side effects or complications from an IUD implant, we urge you to promptly consult with your doctor or physician for an evaluation.

**The listing of a company (e.g., Teva, Teva Women’s Health, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical, The Cooper Companies, or CooperSurgical, etc.) or product (e.g., Paragard IUD) is not meant to state or imply that the company acted illegally or improperly or that the product is unsafe or defective; rather only that an investigation may be, is or was being conducted to determine whether legal rights have been violated.

***The use of any trademarks, tradenames or service marks is solely for product identification and/or informational purposes.

Fill out the form for a free attorney review.