If you or a loved one had stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery involving vaginal mesh and suffered from vaginal mesh complications or injuries, you may be entitled to recover compensation from a vaginal mesh lawsuit or settlement.
A team of medical device injury lawyers and class action attorneys is investigating claims of women (and their spouses) who have suffered from vaginal mesh complications and injuries after having surgery involving transvaginal mesh or TVM mesh.
Transvaginal mesh is a type of surgically implanted mesh (i.e., pelvic mesh implanted through the vagina) that is used to treat and repair stress urinary incontinence SUI (the most common type of urinary incontinence in women that occurs when urine leaks out with sudden pressure on the bladder and urethra) and pelvic organ prolapse POP (when the muscles and tissues supporting pelvic organs such as the uterus, bladder or rectum become weak or loss causing pelvic organs to drop or press into or onto the vagina). Transvaginal mesh includes surgical mesh products such as vaginal tapes, hammocks and bladder slings.
Due to safety concerns, on April 16, 2019 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the manufacturers of all remaining surgical mesh products indicated for the transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) to stop selling and distributing their vaginal mesh products in the U.S., the latest in a series of escalating safety actions related to protecting the health of the thousands of women each year who undergo surgery transvaginally to repair POP.
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit & Settlement Cases
Vaginal mesh lawsuit and settlement cases potentially being investigated include transvaginal mesh lawsuit cases and settlement claims involving the following vaginal mesh brands, among others:
- Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon vaginal mesh lawsuit
- Boston Scientific vaginal mesh lawsuit
- Coloplast vaginal mesh lawsuit
- C.R. Bard vaginal mesh lawsuit
- Cook medical vaginal mesh lawsuit
- Mentor vaginal mesh lawsuit
- Neomedic Pelvic Repair lawsuits
- Y-shaped mesh lawsuits
- Other vaginal mesh lawsuits
Tens of thousands of vaginal mesh lawsuits filed in federal district courts were consolidated and/or transferred into various pelvic mesh multi district litigation or MDLs in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia involving numerous defendants, including Bard, Sofradim, Tissue Science Laboratories, Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson or J&J, Endo Pharmaceuticals, American Medical Systems or AMS, Mentor Worldwide, Coloplast, Cook Medical, Neomedic, Desarrollo and Specialties Remeex.
Vaginal Mesh Injury Cases
Vaginal mesh lawsuit and settlement cases potentially being investigated include claims of women who had stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery involving vaginal mesh products and suffered serious vaginal mesh problems, injuries, side-effects or complications including, among others:
- Corrective or revision surgery
- Multiple mesh revision surgeries
- Surgery to repair vaginal mesh
- Surgery to remove vaginal mesh
- Mesh revision/removal surgery recommended
- Mesh erosion into the vaginal canal
- Mesh extrusion into other organs
- Mesh protrudes or skin split
- Migration of the vaginal mesh
- Punctures or injury to nearby organs
- Bowel, bladder or blood vessel perforations
- Pelvic scarring
- Vaginal scarring
- Pelvic pain
- Vaginal pain
- Nerve damage
- Sepsis
- Infection
- Fistula
- Urinary problems
- Recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI)
- Recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP)
- Pain before, during or after sexual intercourse (dyspareunia)
- Narrowing of vaginal wall
- Vaginal shrinkage
- Bleeding
- Neuromuscular problems
- Hardening of vaginal mesh
- Other vaginal mesh injuries or complications
Time Is Limited To File A Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit
Various deadlines (called statutes of limitation and statutes of repose) may limit the amount of time that women have to file a vaginal mesh lawsuit to try to recover compensation for complications and injuries they claimed to have suffered from transvaginal mesh (TVM) products.
This means that if a transvaginal mesh lawsuit claim is not filed before the applicable time limit or deadline, the injured party may be prohibited from ever pursuing litigation or taking legal action regarding their vaginal mesh injury claim. That is why it is important to connect with a transvaginal mesh injury lawyer or attorney as soon as possible.
If you or someone you love suffered injuries or complications from vaginal mesh, you may be entitled to recover compensation from a vaginal mesh lawsuit case or settlement claim. Contact a medical device injury lawyer to request a free case review.
*If you or a loved one are experiencing health issues, side effects or complications from a medical device (i.e., vaginal mesh, bladder sling, vaginal tape or pelvic mesh), we urge you to promptly consult with your doctor or physician for an evaluation.
**The listing of a company (e.g., Bard, Sofradim, Tissue Science Laboratories, Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson or J&J, Endo Pharmaceuticals, American Medical Systems or AMS, Mentor Worldwide, Coloplast, Cook Medical, Neomedic, Desarrollo and Specialties Remeex) or product (e.g., transvaginal mesh or TVM) is not meant to state or imply that the company acted illegally or improperly or that the product is unsafe or defective; rather only that an investigation may be, is or was being conducted to determine whether legal rights have been violated.
***The use of any trademarks, tradenames or service marks is solely for product identification and/or informational purposes.
Fill out the form for a free attorney review.