If you or a loved one suffered mesh complications or injuries from an Ethicon Gynecare Prolift or Prolift +M pelvic repair product, you may be entitled to recover compensation from a Gynecare Prolift lawsuit case or settlement claim.
A team of medical device injury lawyers and attorneys is investigating vaginal mesh lawsuit claims of women who suffered complications or injury from pelvic mesh products used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, including Gynecare Prolift and/or Prolift +M.
Gyncare Prolift Total, Anterior and Posterior Pelvic Floor Repair Systems were first introduced in around 2005. Gynecare Prolift+M versions were introduced in around 2008. In June of 2012, Ethicon, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, voluntarily withdrew the Gynecare Prolift and Gynecare Prolift +M pelvic floor repair systems.
Gynecare Prolift Lawsuit Cases
J&J Ethicon Gynecare Prolift lawsuit and settlement cases potentially being investigated include claims of women who had a J&J Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Floor Repair System surgically implanted and claim to have suffered serious mesh problems, injuries, side-effects or complications including, mesh revision surgery to remove or replace the Gynecare Prolift mesh, to repair damage to pelvic organs, tissue, or nerves near the site of the Gynecare Prolift mesh and/or additional surgeries or re-operations to treat the recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or pelvic organ prolapse (POP), among others.
If you or someone you love had Gynecare Prolift or Prolift +M mesh implants and suffered injuries or complications, you may be entitled to compensation from a Gynecare Prolift lawsuit or settlement. Contact a medical device injury lawyer to request a free review.
*If you or a loved one are experiencing health issues, side effects or complications from a medical device, we urge you to promptly consult with your doctor or physician for an evaluation.
**The listing of a company (i.e,. J&J or Ethicon) or product (e.g., Gynecare Prolift or Prolift +M) is not meant to state or imply that the company acted illegally or improperly or that the product is unsafe or defective; rather only that an investigation may be, is or was being conducted to determine whether legal rights have been violated.
***The use of any trademarks, tradenames or service marks is solely for product identification and/or informational purposes.
Fill out the form on the right for a free attorney review.